The Truth About “No-Kill”

Why the "No-Kill" Label Can Hurt the Animals We’re Trying to Help

If you’ve ever proudly supported a “no-kill” shelter, you’re not alone. The term has become one of the most recognized and emotionally charged labels in animal welfare.

But here’s the truth: if you don’t fully understand what “no-kill” means, you may be unintentionally contributing to the stigma and misunderstanding surrounding shelters that are saving thousands of lives every year.

At The Adopt Don’t Shop Movement, we deeply respect and appreciate the work of many “no-kill” advocates. They have played a huge role in changing public perception about shelter pets and encouraging adoption. But we also know the label itself can be misleading and at times, damaging to shelters that are doing incredible, lifesaving work but do not, or cannot, meet the “no-kill” definition.

We want you to know the whole story......

Where “No-Kill” Began

The no-kill movement started in the 1980s and 90s as a response to the heartbreaking reality that millions of healthy, adoptable animals were being euthanized each year. The message was powerful: let’s save all healthy and treatable pets. It helped fuel adoption campaigns, encouraged spay/neuter programs, and dramatically increased the number of shelter pets finding homes.

It worked. aAdoptions rose, euthanasia rates dropped, and more communities invested in their shelters. But over time, the term became a marketing badge, creating an unintended divide in animal welfare: “no-kill” shelters seen as good, “kill shelters” seen as bad.

What “No-Kill” Really Means

To be considered “no-kill,” a shelter must place at least 90% of the animals in their care into homes or other safe placement outcomes. That means up to 10% may still be euthanized—often for severe medical conditions, advanced age with suffering, or dangerous behavioral issues.

Here’s the problem:

• There is no national governing body enforcing or verifying “no-kill” claims.

• Data reporting is inconsistent. Some organizations count only healthy, adoptable pets, while others include all animals (including wildlife) in their numbers.

• The label can hide nuance. An open-admission shelter that takes every animal in, no matter how sick, injured, or behaviorally challenged, may have a lower placement percentage due to the condition these pets come in, but still save far more total animals than a limited-admission shelter with “no-kill” status.

The Harm in the Label

The term “no-kill” tugs at our hearts, but it also unintentionally fuels the dangerous “kill shelter” stigma. This paints hardworking, compassionate shelter staff as villains simply because they sometimes must make the heartbreaking decision to euthanize an animal for safety or welfare reasons.

The reality is:

• No one enters animal welfare to "kill" (euthanize) animals.

• Many open admission shelters face severe overcrowding, extremely limited budgets, and waves of owner surrenders and strays.

• Judging them by a single number or label ignores the depth of their impact and the lives they do save.

This stigma doesn’t just hurt shelter workers. It hurts the animals. When a community labels its open-admission shelter as a “kill shelter,” support fades. Adoptions decline, donations dwindle, and the animals wait even longer for homes, deepening the harmful perception that they are somehow “less than” or “broken.”

Open vs. Limited Admission Shelters

A big piece of the “no-kill” puzzle comes down to admission policies:

• Open-admission shelters accept every animal, regardless of health, age, breed, or behavior. They never turn an animal away. Many municipal shelters are required to intake all animals to keep them off the streets and keep people safe.

• Limited-admission shelters can decline animals based on space, health, breed, or behavioral needs, which can make it easier to maintain a high placement rate.

Both models are necessary and when they work together by sharing resources, transferring animals, and supporting each other, communities save more lives.

The Bottom Line

We’re not here to dismiss the amazing work of “no-kill” advocates. We look up to, support, and stand with them. BUT we’re here to remind you:

• The label of "kill" vs "no-kill" is not the full story.

• Euthanasia does not automatically mean failure. It can actually be the most humane, compassionate choice for suffering animals.

• Impact should be measured in lives saved, community service, and the quality of care, not just a live release percentage.

If you want to help animals, the answer is simple: support your local shelters—ALL of them. Adopt, volunteer, donate, and advocate. When we work together, without judgment or division, we save more lives.

Join Us in Changing the Story for Shelter Pets

Everything we do at The Adopt Don't Shop MVMT is to make adoption the only option. By learning, sharing, and acting, you can help rewrite the future for countless animals in need.

The Adopt Don’t Shop Movement is a growing community of passionate animal welfare advocates working toward one powerful vision: to make adoption the only option. We believe that every homeless pet deserves a second chance and that the adoption journey should be accessible, heart-centered, and truly transformative.

Learn More About the Movement »